The ANC’s push for electoral reforms raises questions about its motives following a significant electoral loss in May.
The ANC’s decision to mobilise for electoral reforms has raised questions about the party’s motive, with some seeing the move as self-serving after its May poll loss.
Experts questioned the timing, while the Van Zyl Slabbert commission’s report on electoral reforms gathers dust, despite its plausible recommendations.
Among its recommendations was the implementation of a constituency electoral system. It called for 75% of public representatives to be elected directly by voters.
Report recommendations
Although it was hailed for proposing the most progressive electoral reforms, the report gained no traction from political parties across the board.
They favoured the proportional representation (PR) system because it offered them a chance of obtaining a seat, even if a party obtained a fraction of the contested votes.
ALSO READ: ‘I know Matamela [Ramaphosa] will never sell us out in that GNU’ – Mbalula
But the PR system, despite its popularity among parties, has been criticised for being undemocratic as power stayed with the party, instead of the voters.
ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula yesterday said the party sent its submission to the ministerial panel on electoral reforms.
The panel was appointed to embark on consultations around the need to reform the existing electoral system in the country.
Consultations around need to reform existing electoral system
The deadline for submissions is tomorrow, but the panel has indicated it possibility wanted to extend the deadline.
“The ANC will work with a broad front of civil society organisations to mobilise support for the electoral reforms,” Mbalula said.
ALSO READ: Mbalula warns ANC leaders to stop talking about presidency succession after Mashatile comments
“It believes it will strengthen our democracy and accountability of our public represent atives in a meaningful manner.”
But experts said the ANC had an ulterior motive for the announcement and questioned the timing for its call for reforms.
They believe it had to do with its electoral loss in the May national and provincial elections.
ANC’s electoral loss
Political analyst Zakhele Ndlovu, lecturer at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, put it simply: “Obviously the current electoral system is no longer working in their favour. The ANC should have implemented the Van Zyl Slabbert recommendations long ago.”
Researcher and policy analyst Nkosikhulule Nyembezi said the ANC had become a marginal favourite to play the electoral reforms role when even the composition of the electoral reform panel was opposed by civil society.
ALSO READ: Corruption cancer: ANC’s defensive response to social grant fraud exposé
“Public mood suggests many citizens are disappointed by the ANC’s previous imposition of stumbling blocks on electoral reforms.
“That includes the unsatisfactory legislative framework on independent candidacy and the disclosure of party funding sources,” Nyembezi said.
“A different question is whether hostility is wise.
‘Is hostility wise?’
“Some can refer to the ANC as a number one spoiler of our democracy, but such facile references do little beyond dividing the nation.
“More to the point, opposing opinions on this ANC electoral reform initiative are more likely to evoke the reaction of ‘mind your own business’.
ALSO READ: Warning to GNU leaders: National Party’s decision in 1996 to leave coalition led to its collapse
“The ANC’s many terms of office might have had their alarming moments, but the constitution and the electorate saw it off and may do so again if the talkedabout electoral reforms are regressive,” Nyembezi said.
